Miss Ogynist (a poem)

By Vincent Truman On July 7th, 2011

elevator1

 

So I heard Rebecca Watson told a scary tale
A scary, scary, scary tale
Of being with a man in a Dublin lift
Wherein there was caused not even a rift.

 

For there were no signs of ugly aggression
Or even unwanted sexual attention
There was an invite for chat and for coffee
And no suggestion, I understand, of schtupping or boffing.

 

And when she said, ‘no.’
The man did go.

 

Well!  So rattled Watson soon became
That while not mentioning this poor bastard’s real name
Took her case to the internet
And angry appetites she did prove to whet.

 

On camera she stood tall (well… she sat)
And said, ‘guys, don’t do that’
A blanket statement for half the population
To abbreviate or eliminate their perceived adulation.

 

This scary tale soon reached Richard Dawkins
Who is known for his writin’ and his talkin’s
He found such a proclamation absurd
And voiced as much in many more words.

 

Dawkins scribed a funny, fictional lettah
To a woman that he dubbed Muslima
And told her not to bemoan her plight
Or dare to complain about her lack of rights.

 

For women in the West have it far, far worse!
Like being in an elevator and having some verse
Spoken to one, and when one declines
Having that fellow say nothing but “fine”!

 

Reaction to this joke was instant and fast
As if all the people were joyous at last
To be, at Dawkins, incredibly pissed
And whom they all secretly knew was a misogynist.

 

People demanded apologies from this Oxfordian mutt
And Dawkins replied ‘Apologize for what?’
Which made everyone all the more mad
Mob mentality does not common sense stand!

 

‘You don’t know what it’s like to be afraid
Or made uncomfortable or ashamed!’
Came the 
response from the enraged blogosphere
Laying claim, as they did, to the concept of fear.

 

For me I find I must wonder about this
Although I’m a Mister and I’ve never been Miss
I’m made uncomfortable all of the time
To live in a city is to live near a crime.

 

So I could be shot or attacked or mercilessly mugged
By a random crazy or someone on drugs
So I really don’t know what it’s like to be scared?
Half the population thinks I’ve never been there?

And when I attempted to convey skepticism
Of this laying of claim about misogynism
I was told I have no respect for women or their strife
Holy hell, I thought, I hope no one tells my wife.

 

But if Watson and crew dictated behavior

And allowed only things in which we could savor

Then we’d never hear again from old Richard Dawkins

And forget the hell out of ol’ Sadie Hawkins.

Diamonds of Contentment

By Vincent Truman On May 31st, 2011

250339_10150212207128697_525688696_7074359_6985240_nEveryone is very, very aware that life is short and time is fleeting, but it is a far better thing to feel that it is.

For no one special reason, but rather a domino avalanche of them, several members of a Myspace blogging collective reunited over last weekend. Last year, I was pleased to go and meet a few of them for the first time – including, but not limited to, Aaron Dietz, Gus Sanchez, Andrea Burlingame and Michael ‘Spilt Milk’ Grover – in Seattle. And this year, a trip to New York guaranteed meeting not only Aaron and Gus (and their respective loved ones) but Kristin Weholt, Inga, Erin McParland, Mike Garvey, Shaina Cohen, Christy King, Amanda Van Horn, Jannell Lannon and Luis, etc. within three days.

To merely describe the dinners and social events would prove a disservice to the people who came from all over the world for no other reason than to meet other people who came from all over the world to meet them. So I will attempt mere character sketches of a few of the people I met for the first time, and hope that the minimal lines below will coalesce to form a portrait one can see in one’s mind but one would be unable to draw. Note: I have purposefully avoided talking about girlfriends and wives in any detail.

I will start with Erin McParland, someone who I just missed meeting last time I was in New York. She went out of her way to suggest or arrange places for us Out of Towners to go to, as well as being generous to host a big party with everyone from everywhere. Her smile is easy and her youthful energy is infectious. And she opened her home and heart to everyone.

Mike Garvey was known to me for many years as Armand Assante’s Left Testicle on Myspace. He is acerbic, crude, vile and nasty – but it comes from such a good place that, upon meeting him, the handshake was quickly abandoned in favor of a warm bearhug. Although we did not have too long to have a heart-to-heart, we were able to share a few minutes and a few years of history together. He’s genuine.

Christy King is angular, stunningly attractive and energetic like an Oprah-in-waiting. She described her religion/god to me as the nature she finds in the hearts and minds of other people; one could picture her hosting her own hour-long show and telling her stunned studio audience to look under their chairs. When the audience would return to their upright position, she would smile and say, ‘I didn’t say you were going to win anything – suckaz.’

Amanda van Horn would be a good cartoon lioness. Soft eyes, a perfect mane, a sly smile, a tat of a heart on her right shoulder. Virtually impossible not to greet her with, ‘gawsh, yer purty.’ We did not talk much, but she was a great pleasure not to talk to. I will work on that sentence.

Shaina Cohen sports one of those smiles that turn down at first, and is as vibrant as the ink that decorates her arm. An author/artist finding her way.

Allie Smith – a Smith girl and a Leo – was the biggest surprise.  We are e-friends of an e-friend and only got introduced as Allie was considering relocating to Chicago.  As it turns out, we were very old friends immediately, and while she had not met any of my fellow refugees from Myspace, she dove right in and held her own brilliantly.  Sharp as a razor, soft as a prayer.

Finally, there is Kristin. Like my friend Inga, Kristin hails from Norway. She is what one imagines when one imagines Nordic goddesses, which I never do. She was the first person I met in New York and the last I saw. So New York can be bracketed by the hugs with Kristin. I believe we find each other equally adorable and annoying. Instant siblings. Encouraging words come from one when the other is a little down; and when one is feeling overly confident, the other one pours a nice hot cup of sarcasm. As a result of our multiple meals and long walks through Central Park, we were very adept at finding each other’s buttons. Whenever I might look at her for more than two consecutive seconds, she would snap back, ‘What?!‘, drop-kicking me into a fluster that would take me some time from which to recover. She also enjoyed calling me “creepy”, which is one button that terrifies me – and one that was pressed more repeatedly than Helen Keller’s doorbell.

In return, I would poke fun at her many stories of her boyfriend – and how she misses him and how wonderful he is, etc. It did get to the point where Kristin was thinking of him so often and fondly that whatever we were discussing would snap, quite quickly, into a story about her boyfriend. During one of the days, lounging in a hotel bar and sampling oysters on a half shell, Inga and I wondered if there was anything that we could say that would not instantly turn into a story about her boyfriend. I offered up that my wife was enduring her time of the month. Within a minute of this revelation, Kristin pointed out that, yes, her boyfriend, too, gives plenty of blood.

And coursing through all of these people was, of course, that beast known as New York, with its constant murmuring, breathing and rumbling that make it sound like either an underground animal, living under the pavement and plotting to escape, or a music more melodious than Mozart and thick like jazz. Even at 330am, when the city is most quiet, one is aware of something under the pavement, itching to get out to take on another day.

As I sit on the stoop of Park 79, the bastard child of any number of overnight facilities (hostel, boutique hotel, YMCA, some social experiment), I am pleased and happy and on fire with inspiration. It is these diamonds of contentment that, when worn properly, permit one to forget about who one is and what journey one is on and simply bask in the reflections of the friends one has.

Perhaps the group is best summed up by something Aaron Dietz said to me as we were saying goodbye for the second time:

Keep hugging me. She’s going to take a picture.”


Friends Like These: Chat With a Christian

By Vincent Truman On February 16th, 2011

 aaaaa1OK, just to get it out of the way.  With a title like that and me being an atheist, you probably can foresee the punch line of this piece.  However, this case is unusual for these reasons.  (1) The Christian and I are not strangers, we are real-life acquaintances, for years.  (2)  While we are diametrically opposed on the Spiritual Scale, we have enough passion in common – women’s rights, especially – that our friendship has been built on a solid respect of those things we both deem important and a mutual respect for those things we may disagree with.

 

Until last night.

 

It began when, on Facebook, I posted a video of Christopher Hitchens, the Vanity Fair editor and author, criticizing some of the tenets of Christianity.   This is a common enough thing – people post videos and links all the time about things they like and support.  Indeed, The Christian is known for posting from a ‘God Wants You To Know’ application.  That’s all well and good.  …or is it?  On came the comments.  It is important to stress that I have not edited any of the language chosen by The Christian or me in the exchange below.

 

The Christian: “This man is a raging narcissist. I think he doesn’t like the concept of God because he thinks HE is God. I agree evolution is not a theory, it is a working model and I am a devout Christian. If I want to read about theology, I read the Bible or Church teachings if I want to read about science I read a science book or website. He reduces religious people and theology to essentialist terms ( of his own making) and doesn’t account for the extreme variance in theologies across faiths and denominations. YAWN.”

 

Vincent Truman:Predictably enough, I don’t see the narcissism so much as an objective discounting of certain theological ideas (admittedly, not theories, as they cannot be tested). I find no missteps in his presentation, which dotes, we may both agree, on a rejection of faith and/or wish fulfillment.

 

The Christian: “Well, I agree he rejects faith but I don’t agree with him that faith is wish fulfillment. I repeat: He is a self-involved YAWN.”

 

Vincent Truman: “Now, be fair, Missy. I don’t piss in your pool with your daily ‘god wants you to know’ app, so don’t feel obliged to denigrate my corner of the philosophical market.

 

The Christian: “You regularly denigrate my Christian viewpoints through your posts, that is fine you are entitled to your opinions and you have to realize on some level you do open yourself up criticism it by posting it on Facebook. I am being fair, I frankly do not mind you commenting on my faith-based posts. I don’t like Christopher Hitchens and stand by all my prior comments. He is a man after all, not a deity.”

 

Vincent Truman: OK, then I’ll consider myself invited to slap down your posts on your own page. I thought we were being mutual respectful, but I can suspend that, too. :)

 

The Christian: “This is a laughable waste of time. Time to prune my friend list.”

 

At which time I was immediatley deleted from her friends’ list. 

 

Another commercial for ‘love thy neighbor – unless you don’t wanna’ theology.